You have not stated EXACTLY where ON THE POLICE REPORT it says that Aarman is the developer.
Philosophy 101: The person making the positive claim always has the burden of proof. You’re the person making the positive claim in this case, by insisting that Aarman is the developer. All you have provided, Dave, in the way of “proof” is one flimsy conjecture involving a screen shot and a whole lot of opinion that will not stand up in court, or in the mind of any rational person. Your “proof” does not invalidate Diane’s accurate representation of fact, nor does it disqualify that there could have been two people present that day, and the police were referring to the real ‘developer’ when they mentioned him in the report.
Also, since there is no police report in existence that says anything about Aarman being the developer, and you sure as hell weren’t present when the police interview was being conducted, where in the world do you get off claiming that ‘Aarmon has admitted to the Police he is the “developer”’?
]]>Philosophy 101: The person making the positive claim always has the burden of proof. You’re the person making the positive claim in this case, by insisting that Aarman is the developer. All you have provided, Dave, in the way of “proof” is one flimsy conjecture involving a screen shot and a whole lot of opinion that will not stand up in court, or in the mind of any rational person. Your “proof” does not invalidate Diane’s accurate representation of fact, nor does it disqualify that there could have been two people present that day, and the police were referring to the real ‘developer’ when they mentioned him in the report.
Also, since there is no police report in existence that says anything about Aarman being the developer, and you sure as hell weren’t present when the police interview was being conducted, where in the world do you get off claiming that ‘Aarmon has admitted to the Police he is the “developer”’?
]]>Seeing that you seem to think you have some kind of divine, omnipresent knowledge about this whole thing, I would really like you to link me up to the police report you always allude to and specify EXACTLY where it says that Aarman is the developer.
I wait with bated breath.
]]>
]]>If it ever comes to pass (and I hope it will), I will thoroughly enjoy seeing an irresponsible moron such as yourself being eviscerated in a libel suit. Maybe your friend John Daly can cover it on Global.
]]>Most of those folks live in my community. As such, I have had time to consider and re-consider my position, and all is well.
]]>